‘Fake Starter’? Fighting Words To WVU’s Jordan McCabe

‘Fake Starter’? Fighting Words To WVU’s Jordan McCabe


MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — Jordan McCabe has heard it. Sometimes he’s tuned it out. Other times, the cacophony still filtered through. What, the narrative went, was he doing still starting for West Virginia’s very successful basketball team?

Some of the discussion was reasoned and understandable. McCabe wasn’t scoring, had a shooting percentage below the Mendoza line, and was turning the ball over at an unacceptable rate. Would WVU be better with someone else running the team at the outset of games?

West Virginia guard Jordan McCabe (5) clears space for a shot against Texas' Matt Coleman (2)
West Virginia guard Jordan McCabe (5) clears space for a shot against Texas’ Matt Coleman (2)

Then there was the disgusting, yet predictable segment of onlookers – they don’t dignify being called “fans” – who made their ugly voices heard via social media. Catcalls and personal attacks, the norm for many parts of the social media universe, denigrated him and his play. It even extended to some “media” – again a term used very loosely.

“We heard a lot of stuff about being ‘fake starters’,” McCabe said after putting together a very good 23-minute performance against Texas in which he scored 10 points on 4-of-7 shooting, including 2-of-3 from beyond the arc. He also added four rebounds, two assists and a steal as he and the rest of the starting five broke out of the doldrums to build an early lead against the Longhorns. “People can tell you they don’t hear it, but they do.”

Some of the criticism is borne out of normal fan frustration. The  expectation that players are always going to trend in one direction, and improve on a steady upward trajectory, isn’t realistic, but when it doesn’t happen, calls for benching and the pulling of scholarships break out. Some is a lack of understanding that points and rebounds aren’t the only measure of play, although they are obviously important. And some is simple ignorance.

In McCabe’s case, it might also stem from his showing last year, in a strange way. He was at the center of the team’s rally from a 2-13 stretch that was marked by the departure of malcontents and a team dynamic that bordered on dysfunctional to one that produced a pair of wins in the Big 12 Championship, including one over eventual national runner-up Texas Tech. While the Mountaineers certainly were far from a polished product, their 5-4 mark over the final nine games of the year, sparked in part by McCabe’s excellent leadership, gave hope for this year.

It’s instructive to note at this point that McCabe wasn’t a huge numbers guy in 2018-19. He averaged 5.8 points per game, and his shooting marks of 32.2% overall and 33.8% from 3-point range didn’t ring any bells. It was his gritty determination to hold the team together, to work endlessly in the gym, to serve as as example to others (his relationship with Derek Culver is one of many to cite) that made him just as valuable as his play on the floor.

However, when McCabe’s numbers fell off this years, the discontent bloomed. His passes were sometimes off the mark or ill-considered, and he dribbled in place without an end goal at times. There was no longer any praise given for the leadership role, even though that still remained. The fact that he’s always the first on the floor for pre-game, and that he’s constantly in the gym on his own and bringing others along with him? Ignored. He wasn’t playing as well as last year, and was viewed as a liability. Thus, the barrage of negative comments increased.

McCabe not only admits that he heard that, but that he might have reacted to it in the wrong manner.

“I think I went too far one way,” he said of his response. “I tried to tune it out. I deleted for a while all my socials, and stayed off of them.  I think that’s good, to take a detox sometimes.  At the same time, I have always been one who reads that stuff and lets it fuel me.”

Was it as simple as that?  It’s an easy conclusion to draw, and one that would be a feel-good ending to this story arc. In reality, though, it’s still playing out. McCabe’s play, and that of a couple of other starters who have been going through slumps, was excellent against the Longhorns. Still, that’s just one game, and McCabe knows that, while also acknowledging that getting off to a good start was important in reversing the trend of falling behind early in some games.

“It’s really important,” he said of hitting a few shots early on and building a lead right out of the gate. “We are deep and with guys that can come off the bench and do what they do, sometimes you can get buried. But if we are winning, we are winning. We just want to pull our own weight. ‘Fake starter’ and all that stuff, whatever you want to call me, or us as a unit, we are a damn scary team when we play like we did tonight. End of story.”

That’s the story that McCabe wants to write, and one that Mountaineer fans should be happy to be a part of.

Home Page forums ‘Fake Starter’? Fighting Words To WVU’s Jordan McCabe

  • This topic has 7 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated by ButlereerButlereer.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #109409

    ‘Fake Starter’? Fighting Words To WVU’s Jordan McCabe MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — Jordan McCabe has heard it. Sometimes he’s tuned it out. Other times, the c
    [See the full post at: ‘Fake Starter’? Fighting Words To WVU’s Jordan McCabe]

    #109421

    McCabe has a high basketball IQ and gives it 100%. Huggins knows this and has said so himself. I’m glad he’s a Mountaineer! Keep up the hard work!

    #109433

    I’m going to try to strike a balanced post. McCabe is a talented, smart, developing player who I believe has  tremendous potential.He hasn’t came close to realizing that potential.I have often questioned the decision of starting him and then benching him abou 5 to 10 minutes in never to be seen again. With Huggins I believe it’s a learning process and he’s the HOF coach not me. Having said that, the criticisms of McCabe’s performance thus far this season are not unwarranted.As far as the personal attacks on his character. People who resort to those kinds of things have bigger personal problems all their own.

    #109438
    JAL

    Start with the obvious, the team is 15-3 so no player is dragging the team down.

    McCabe, as a leader, adds things that go beyond the stats.  He has the talent to improve the stats.

    Certainly there are valid criticisms of his play but it is clear he works hard and adds to the team.

    #109458

    My biggest issue with McCabe was his defense. Whether he was fundamentally bad, overestimating his own ability/quickness or whatever he just couldn’t stay in front of his man.

    That seems to have improved.

    On the offensive end he relegated himself to launching from deep rather than driving and getting into a mid range game that not only helps him out in terms of scoring but opens things up for everyone.

    I like his current trajectory.

    If he can be a guy that gets 8pts, 6 assists, a steal or two and limit the TOs then we will be in great shape down the stretch.

    #109486

    These are definitely fair discussion points, and it’s ok to critique play. It’s just when it swerves into the personal attacks or unreasonable statements that I have problems.

    I do like the way Jordan seems to be handling this. If he can get to Mex’s numbers, that would be really big. I’d take a six ppg average, 3-4 assists, with the limited TOs being the biggest thing. Probably 15 or so minutes per game?

    #109502

    Any points are a positive. Jordan brings other values to the team. Floor leader and motivator being 2 of them. His assist would increase if those whom he passed to would actually make a basket.

    Personally I like the combo of Jordan at point and McBride at the two. This is seldom used perhaps for a reason. When you have 6 really good guards it’s hard to shuffle the minutes for them.

    #109513

    There is no doubt that Jordan is the best floor general at PG that we have.  There is no doubt that he is the best passer on the team.  Unfortunately some of his passes are fumbled by the receiver either because they have stone hands or because they just don’t anticipate the pass coming.  There is no doubt that Jordan can shoot the ball and unfortunately there is no doubt that he is in a supreme slump from the floor.  And there is no doubt that he has some limitations on D because of his size and foot speed.

    That being said, he still is the best true PG we have on the team.  Others can drive the paint better and put up better numbers in the box score, but they don’t come close to moving the O the way Jordan does.  If we were getting more production out of Emmitt and Jermaine we wouldn’t be having this conversation.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.